Fujinon XF50mm f/2.0: BHphoto, Adorama, AmazonUS, Focuscamera; Blog Posts. ivanjoshualoh – XF50mm F1.0 WR vs XF56mm F1.2 APD; abiggercamera XF50mmF1.0 review coverage – Part 1 / Part 2 / Part 3 / comparison with 56mmF1.2 / Part 4; imaging-resource – Fujifilm XF 50mm f/1.0 Field Test: Fuji’s newest prime lens is all about that bokeh Even at f/2.4 the lens performs very well, and despite that slightly slow aperture, the lens still works nicely for candid portraits with a decent balance between DOF isolation and getting the entire face in full focus. Early in my X-Pro1 usage, I found myself gravitating a lot to this lens, despite the focus shortcomings. I can certainly see the XF 70-300mm as an excellent option for just about any type of outdoor field sport where you have plenty of light to work with. For more demanding situations and for low-light photography perhaps consider the XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR or XF 90mm f/2 R LM WR instead. Fujifilm XF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Image Quality It replaces the aging XF 27mm f/2.8 (note that the old model doesn’t have an R and WR in the name), which was released in 2013. This refresh improves the original model’s shortcomings while not messing with what made it great. The Fujinon XF 27mm f/2.8 R WR, which retails for $399, is a pancake lens, which means that it’s small and flat. Great review. Small addition though - this lens can easily replace the, impossible to find, XF27mm f2.8 R WR, which costs £419.99 in the UK, despite being in plentiful supply and only costing ~£ In this episode I view the Fujifilm 50mm f2. I’ve taken some of my favourite photos with this lens which in my opinion is better value than the Fujifilm 56mm At a 170g, the XF 35mm F2 R WR lens ( B&H Photo / Amazon) is light but like many of the newer generation lenses from Fuji, this is a very well-built lens, and if you own the older XF 35mm F1.4, you will definitely notice the difference between the two in terms of build quality. The XF 35mm F2 is solid, and in many ways, this lens reminds me of In our review of the Fujifilm XF 50mm F1.0 R WR we test bokeh, sharpness, flare, focus performance and much more. We also compare the depth of field to the F The Fujifilm XF 50mm F1.0 R WR is bigger, bulkier and heavier than any other Fuji XF prime lens of a similar focal length. In fact, among all XF primes only the XF 200mm F2 is heavier or has a broader barrel, while only the 80mm, 90mm or 200mm primes are longer. (The 200mm F2 absolutely dwarfs the 50mm, though.) Versus the XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR. 24-85mm equivalent, metal 77mm filter thread, 23.2 oz./657g, 1'/0.3m close focus. The XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR is one stop faster for use in low light, but otherwise has a more restricted zoom range, weaker macro range, and is bigger, heavier and more expensive. ZwOROop.